The Populist

Antony Sutton on Bolsheviks funded by Wall Street

Here is a link to the audio of the interview. If you notice any errors in the written transcript, please let me know.



Interviewer  00:26

Getting back to the Bolshevik Revolution. One of the ironies of it is that both Lenin and Trotsky were in exile, one in Germany, one in the United States. Tell us about how who helped them get where they were going to make sure that revolution was pulled off?

Antony Sutton  00:43

Well, let me summarize about four chapters into four minutes. Trotsky was in New York. He had no income. I summed his income for the year he was in New York, it was about $600. Yet he lived in an apartment. He had a chauffeured limousine, he had a refrigerator, which is very well in those days. He left New York and went to Canada on his way to the revolution. He had $10,000 in gold on him. He didn’t earn more than $600 in New York. He was financed out of New York, there’s no question about that. The British took him off the ship in Halifax, Canada, I got the Canadian archives. They knew who he was they knew who Trotsky was. They knew he was going to start a revolution in Russia, instructions from London came to put Trotsky back on the boat with his party and allow them to go forward. So there’s no question that Woodrow Wilson, who issued the passport for Trotsky and the New York financiers, who financed Trotsky, and the British Foreign Office allowed Trotsky to perform his part in the Revolution. Now over in Switzerland, you get Lenin who was in exile. He went through Germany in the famous seal train by permission, and but with the encouragement of the German general staff, and yet Germany and Britain was supposed to be fighting each other. And you get them both moving these two key revolutions into place inside Russia. And then of course, the rest is history. They created revolution, with no more than about 10,000 revolutionaries. They needed assistance from the West, and they got assistance from Germany, from Britain and from the United States to continue and consolidate the revolution.

Interviewer  02:32

Just tell us all over again. Why?

Antony Sutton  02:34

why? You wont find this in textbooks. Why is to bring about I suspect they plan to control world society in which you and I wont find the freedoms to believe and think and do as we believe

Interviewer  02:47

Did these powerbrokers actually envision at that time, a one world government that would be socialist?

Antony Sutton  02:56

yes. The second statement I made was that they did not want the Soviet Union to develop into another free enterprise society, and that this would offset it. Aiding revolution would offset this event that was made as a statement in 1919. You have various books, one by Gillette, the razor blade Gillette, this called The City I think it was which laid out this Corporate Socialism for the world to see as early as what 1905 1910 So around the turn of the century, you begin to see excellent written statements by these internationalist businessman as the kind of socialist Empire they wanted to bring about. It’s that these books, of course, are not included in your courses in political science and history at the local universities

Interviewer  03:46

Well talk about the Red Cross mission,

Antony Sutton  03:48

Red Cross Mission to Russia, 1918 

Interviewer  03:52

bankers, lawyers, businessmen, a couple of doctors 

Antony Sutton  03:57

 I think there were two doctors. 

Interviewer  04:00

What was the mission? 

Antony Sutton  04:01

The mission was financed by William Boyce Thompson, the Chase Manhattan Bank, Federal Reserve System, The Red Cross didnt want to send the mission, The Red Cross said “we don’t need a mission to Russia.” They already had one in Romania, which was doing a good job. But William Boyce Thompson wanted this mission and he put the money up, he financed it. And if you look, I printed a list of the people on the mission and they were mostly bankers and lawyers, Wall Street lawyers and people in and around the Wall Street establishment. The function or the purpose of this mission was to be in place to assist the Bolshevik Revolution. The Red Cross mission to Russia was a cover vehicle. It enabled these Wall Street elitists, these Wall Street manipulators to be there in place. And then I traced the cable $1 million from the Morgan company in New York to Petrograd. I forget to which bank but it came from William Boyce Thompson and which financed the revolution. And then they put pressure back in the State Department in Washington to actually send arms to the revolution which went forward in 1918. And then I found in the State Department files, an extraordinary telegram in which Trotsky appealed to the State Department to send American army instructors to train the new Soviet army. And I think I reprinted that in one of my earlier books. So briefly, the Red Cross mission was a cover vehicle to enable Wall Street to be there in place to guide and manipulate the ongoing Bolshevik Revolution.

Interviewer  05:35

What was the response of the State Department?

Antony Sutton  05:37

Oh yes, they were quite willing to send  US Army instructors.

Interviewer  05:39

 Do you know to what extent?

Antony Sutton  05:40

I don’t know if they went forward? I know the arms. I know the rifles went forward. I didn’t trace the response to the telegram, except it was approved within State Department. And I reprinted the telegram I never did find a response thats probably taken out the files.

Interviewer  05:58

Do you know the figure to which Wall Street supported the Bolsheviks? 

Antony Sutton  06:02

Well, it was $1 million, 

Interviewer  06:06

Just the William Boyce Thompson figure? 

Antony Sutton  06:08

That figure, but then you’ve got the other Assistance. For example, the whole Siberian episode. See in 1918 The Bolsheviks really only controlled Moscow. And what was then Petrograd which is now Leningrad. They could not have beaten off the white Russians. The Czechs who were in Russia at that time, the Japanese who had a Bolshevik, they could not have beaten it off without assistance from United States and from Britain. And the Siberian Bellbird is critical. Because if you look at that map of Russia, in Moscow, and Leningrad has stuck at the left end, and you got the vast expanse of Russia, which and the backbone is the Trans Siberian railroad. Now, the history books will tell you that American troops went in, they occupied the Trans Siberian railroad in order to prevent the Japanese from coming in. Well this is absolute nonsense. I’ve never written the book. I hope to get around to it one day, I’ve got two big boxes of files on this. The purpose of the American army in Siberia was to hold the Trans Siberian railroad until the Bolsheviks were strong enough to take it over. And it did that very effectively. They held off the Japanese they held them back near Manchuria. They evacuated the checks out along the Trans Siberian railroad. The French and the British gave up because they said the Americans are helping the Bolsheviks; they evacuated. And in one of these books, I’ve reprinted a little clipping from the New York Times of I think 1919. Finally, the Bolsheviks got to Vladivostok right at the far end of Siberia, near Japan, in which the local commissar addressed the American army and thanked them for aiding the revolution. And that was in the New York Times. And I reprinted that. Now, this is totally contrary to everything you find in textbooks. The textbooks say we went into Siberia to at least be neutral. And I suppose most people would assume we went in to stop the Bolsheviks. We didn’t,  we went in to help the Bolsheviks. There’s no question.

Interviewer  08:24

There’s no question that they could not have consolidated their revolution without the capitalists?

Antony Sutton  08:29

Absolutely not. Absolutely not. They had too many enemies. Not only not only outside enemies, the white Russians. They, the Ukrainians themselves, were not particularly happy at all, your ethnic groups in Russia were not particularly happy with the Bolsheviks. They could not have won without western assistance, there is no question about. Then there was starving, or the factory they couldn’t operate the factories because the Bolsheviks shot all the managers and the technician; either that or they left Russia. The factories were closed down, while Russia was starving. By 1922 Lenin himself said “The end has come.” They had no food. They had these closed down plants. The plants were not destroyed in the revolution. That’s what the textbooks will tell you including Kennen, the State Department expert. He says the plants, the Russian factories were destroyed in the revolution, they were not destroyed. Why? Because I’ve seen the photographs after the revolution and the writing the Hoover Institution ta. There are these massive boxes of photographs of Russian industry after the revolution. They could not operate the plants. So what do we do with Avril Harriman and the Chase Bank and National Bank and old friends on Wall Street they go in there. And of course the Hoover mission to feed Russia. We go in there and we have these 250 300 concessions in which American companies went into Russia and they started up the idle plants. Harriman, Avril Harriman took the manganese concessions, Arm & Hammer, Occidental Petroleum took the pencil factories and the asbestos plants. And all these top capitalists went in and they got Russia going on behalf of the Bolsheviks, because the Bolshevik’s they either shot or kicked out all the people, all the Russians who could run the plants. Another point, that Czsarist industry was at a very high level, your textbooks would tell you that Czrarist industry was backward. It wasn’t till the Soviets came along, that it began to make progress. This is absolute nonsense. The Soviets, the Russians in 1913, had two indigenous Russian vehicles, Russian automobiles, there has never been an indigenous Soviet automobile they’ve all come from the west. The czarist Russians produced an airplane in 1916, with a wingspan longer than the 747. This is not known today, it’s just wiped out history. Technologically, the Czarist Russians were at least on a par with the rest of the world. They only began to decline when the Soviets took over. And then you’ve got the long history from that point onwards, how we got the first five year plan 1929, 1933. I look at the first five year plan, I look at every plant that was built in Russia at that time, every single plant was built by a Western company. Not one single plant was built by the Soviets. You name any plant, if there are any Russians here from way back, you name any plant in the first five year plan. And you know as well as I do, who built it. It wasn’t the Soviets, it was a Western company. And you run down the list. Caterpillar Tractor, there are more Caterpillar tractors in the Soviet Union, than are outside the Soviet Union. Ford, Ford Model A, well Ford built the Gorky plant. And as soon as the Ford engineers left, they started to turn out military vehicles. You name it, in the first five year plan, every single plant was built basically by American companies, but a lot of British French and a German and Japanese in there too. Then the second five year plan in 1930, it was a duplicate, they tried to copy the first five year plan with the only sources they fell flat on their faces. And they had to come back to the Western companies to, for assistance to duplicate the plants put in the first five year plan. And for example, I was in Douglas Aircraft Company, they let me into their files. And it was amazing the detailed assistance given by Douglas Aircraft, they bought one DC3. And then they bought a DC3 and sub assembly and all kinds of duplicate spare parts to get this thing going. And then we’ve got that story. I don’t know how much detail you want, which continues right up to today, July 1 1987. And you mentioned I think, this morning that Toshiba, the Toshiba Japanese plant and the Norwegian company, a government owned plant, which provided the milling machines which enabled now the submarines to be 10 times quieter than they were before. And that’s going to cost us $4 billion so that we can offset what we have given them. And this stupidity has continued for, well, stupidity, in my sense, from the viewpoint of a Wall Street capitalist, I guess it’s smart business. This has continued for over 60 years,

Interviewer  13:24

And this supposedly by our allies, but this is not the people of Japan and Norway. This is again the internationalists

Antony Sutton  13:31

It’s the internationalists. Toshiba represented on the Trilateral Commission founded by David Rockefeller 1973. It’s your top corporate, corporate elitists, your top corporate establishment attourneys, your top politicians. Senator Mansfield, once said “You don’t get along unless you go along.”

I’m Lee Stranahan. Welcome to Populist.TV

I made this video for you ecause I’ve been so far ahead of the real story of #Russiagate and #Ukrainegate for about three years now, a lot of people are hearing about me and my work for the first time. 

And the false attacks are coming. 

Here’s who I am and what I do. 


Save MAGA: Exposing The Fraud Part One: Jeff Giesea

Save MAGA: Exposing The Fraud Part One: Jeff Giesea

While President Trump and his millions of supporters have been mercilessly and unfairly attacked by the mainstream media as anti-Semites, racists and white supremacists for years, it turns out that a powerful self-appointed leader of the #MAGA movement named Jeff Giesea has been actively and secretly funding and supporting openly racist individuals and groups.

This is Part One of a story about the stunning betrayal of President Trump and the entire country, especially the Trump #MAGA base. It’s a story about hypocrisy, fraud, and secret social media accounts spewing propaganda, most of it aimed directly at Trump supporters by well-funded influencers who infiltrated the MAGA movement claiming they are Trump supporters, yet secretly pushing messages like Rape Melania.

The consequences of the actions of this small group of liars have been profound, including perpetuating the worst stereotypes about Trump and his supporters, further dividing the nation, and a pattern of personal destruction against anyone trying to expose them.

In an era where Americans need to be constantly on guard against what President Trump has rightly called “fake news” this is a story about how social media stars were quite literally creating fake news and hiding their real goals.

How A Small Group of Hucksters Took Advantage Of Trump’s Momentum

After Donald Trump announced he was running for President in 2015, he also immediately became the front runner. His brash style and straight talk on issues like immigration and putting America first attracted both ardent supporters and crazed critics.


The 2016 election season also saw the rapid rise of a number of new “internet celebrities” like Mike Cernovich and Jack Posobiec, as well as the new phenomenon of “memes” like the pictures of a cartoon character named Pepe the Frog.

Trump supporters gave none of this a second thought, likely just assuming that people like Cernovich and Posobiec simply gained in popularity due to their own hard work and the exposure of the then-new video streaming platform of Periscope.


When the Clinton-supporting media attacked Cernovich and Posobiec and even the cartoon character Pepe the Frog as racist, the Trump base saw these claims as more examples of Trump Derangement Syndrome. Meanwhile, the MSM had no no problem smearing everyone in a MAGA hat with the same broad brush. The average Trump supporter knew this wasn’t true, because their Trump supporting friends weren’t racists and neither were they, so they saw the relentless claims were just more fake news by media that had irrationally hated Trump and his agenda from the minute he came down the escalator at Trump Tower to announce he was running.


What the #MAGA grassroots didn’t know was that Cernovich, Posobiec and even Pepe were being actually being pushed and promoted behind the scenes by a mysterious millionaire named Jeff Giesea, a powerful figure who was actually funding and promoting real “white power” racists.

Giesea’s influence has continued after the election, where he has continued his work behind the scenes with groups like Charlie Kirk’s Turning Point USA and right-leaning think tanks like the Center for Security Policy.

In an effort to turn the Republican party into something that would sicken Donald Trump himself and try to profit from selling “meme warfare” to both the world’s military and political campaigns, Giesea and his associates like Cernovich and Posobiec were literally supporting the worst of what the mainstream media was accusing Trump and the #MAGA nation of.

The hypocrisy and dishonesty of Jeff Giesea is shocking and it’s being laid out here for the first time, in an effort to help expose the truth about who was actually behind many of the events and people that ended up bringing so much hatred and negative press to both Donald Trump and his real supporters.

Who is Jeff Giesea?

Jeff Giesea may not be a name familiar to many Trump supporters, but during the 2016 election, Giesea’s political connections, organizational and business skills made the him the “man who helped to build the Trump Meme Army” who was directly behind the rise of social media figures like Cernovich and Posobiec. At first glance, most of his resume and public views are exactly the sort of thing that a libertarian-leaning Trump supporter would love.

Jeff Giesea

Giesea describes himself as a private person and keeps a low profile. He currently has no page on Wilkipedia, which is unusual for a person with Giesea’s business and political background, which includes work with billionaire Trump advisor Peter Thiel and the Koch Brothers.

His LinkedIn profile says he is currently a “Strategy Consultant & Executive Coach” and in his Twitter biography, he describes himself as:

Media entrepreneur now interested in politics & national security. Toddler dad, gay, Stanford sports fan, independent thinker. It’s complicated but works.

However, as we’ll see in Part Two of this series, the real Jeff Giesea may be complicated but what he was up to behind the scenes didn’t “work” for either President Trump or his supporters.

Geisea is currently listed (without a biography) as being on the Advisory Council of the influential pro-Trump 501c(3) group Turning Point USA,who are engaged in campus activism through media personalities like Charlie Kirk and Candance Owens. Giesea was previously on the board of the libertarian campus outreach group Students for Liberty. Giesea was also on the board of the libertarian Foundation for Economic Freedom until 2016.

There are few articles about Giesea online, but his coverage in places like Buzzfeed and Wiredfocused on his work with Posobiec and Cernovich on the inaugural DeploraBall party and his work on memes.

Giesea was one of the key organizers of DeploraBall, a series of pro-Trump parties after his election victory. The main DeploraBalll event, that took place in Washington, DC just prior to President Trump inauguration. Cernovich, Posobiec and Jeff Giesea were all in attendance.

Geisea gave a short speech at this event, praising economic nationalism and putting America first, but he also gave a little bit of his personal biography and one detail is worth noting here; a generations old connection to the elite secret society group The Bohemian Club and Bohemian Grove.

I think of my grandmother, who came the United States from Mexico as a small child in the 1920s. Her family wanted the opportunity for a better life. They wanted to be Americans.

While my grandmother was crossing the border, my great-grandfather on the other side of my family was presiding over the Bohemian Club in San Francisco. He was president of the Bohemian Grove, a place of privilege and power. He was a fierce advocate of Western Civilization and ideals.

I point out this link because later in this series, I’ll remind that one of the people hurt most by an association with Cernovich and Posobiec is Infowar’s Alex Jones, who was one of the first outsiders to actually get inside the elite retreat and expose what was going on there.

Giesea’s claim in a Buzzfeed article covering the Deploraball that was was “reforming” the #MAGA movement seems ironic given that he personally supported white power advocated, a topic we well get into in depth in Part Two.

It’s worth noting that Giesea doesn’t appear to view the memes the same way that the average Trump supporter likely does; as a strange offshoot of internet culture, likely pushed mostly by young people who a lot of free time in their hands.

The real story of what is behind these “memes” can be found in Heff Giesea’s own writings. Giesea has published articles and memes and “memetic warfare” on at places like NATO Strategic Communication’s website.

In his article / sales pitch It’s Time To Embrace Memetic Warfare, Giesea lays out this view that NATO should embrace new forms of propaganda:

Memetic warfare, as I define it, is competition over narrative, ideas, and social control in a social-media battlefield. One might think of it as a subset of ‘information operations’ tailored to social media. Information operations involve the collection and dissemination of information to establish a competitive advantage over an opponent. Memetic warfare could also be viewed as a ‘digital native’ version of psychological warfare, more commonly known as propaganda. If propaganda and public diplomacy are conventional forms of memetic warfare, then trolling and PSYOPs are guerrilla versions.

Remember; geese are not against propaganda. It’s making an argument that NATO—one of Trump’s biggest institutional opponents, it should be noted—should use propaganda. And as you’ll, the target of Giese’s guerilla version of propaganda was Trump supporters themselves.

In order to sell his notion of “mimetic warfare” and social media propaganda, Giesea had a video produced that he posted on his personal YouTube page.


Also mentioned in Giesea’s NATO article is another important behind the scenes figure named Charles Johnson.

Charles Johnson

Geese has referred to Charles Johnson as a friend and inspiration. In his NATO white paper, Giesea mentions discussing memes over beers with Johnson in 2015 and in the Giesea has referred to Charles Johnson as a friend and inspiration. In a paper that Giesea published that the NATO Stratcom website, Giesea mentions discussing memes over beers with Johnson in 2015. As BuzzFeed reported in 2016:

When I met Chuck I wondered why we weren’t weaponizing people like him,” Giesea said. “He led me on this intellectual journey.”

We’ll be discussing the role of Charles Johnson in this hoax against #MAGA later in this series, but it’s worth noting that Johnson is also close to other Republicans who are riding Trump’s coattails, like Florida Congressman Matt Gaetz.

In fact, Gaetz brought Johnson as his guest to the State of the Union address, and when he was criticized for bringing Johnson—who is close with several white power advocates—Gaetz used one of Johnson’s longtime friends as a reference; convicted pedophile Jeff Epstein’s friend and lawyer Alan Dershowitz.

Once again, these are toxic connections that seem also designed to make President Trump and his family look bad.

Rep. Gaetz is scheduled to be a featured speaker at October’s American Priority conference, along with Donald Trump Jr, former Turning Point’s Charlie Kirk and Giesea operative Jack Posobiec.

What does Jeff Giesea Want?

In the Wired article about the DelploraBall, Giesea makes his own goal clear: he wants his own version of #MAGA to take over.

“We’re trying to assert our presence as the new type of Republican,” Jeff Giesea, who organized the event with Cernovich, told me before the ball. “This is not your dad’s or mom’s Republican party anymore.”

While the idea of a “new type of Republican” may sound appealing to many Trump supporters, it‘s important to be very careful about listening to someone like Giesea who brags about being adept in propaganda.

As we’ll see in Part Two, the real Jeff Giesea’s vision for a “new type of Republican party.



Video That Proves Mike Cernovich is Lying About Jeffrey Epstein Goes Viral

Video That Proves Mike Cernovich is Lying About Jeffrey Epstein Goes Viral

A segment from the Radio Sputnik show Fault Lines with Nixon and Stranahanwent viral after co-host Lee Stranahan accused social media personality MikeCernovich of misleading his audience about this role in the Jeffery Epstein case.

Cernovich claims credit for being “the first person to file” to unseal records regarding the billionaire’s alleged sexual abuse of dozens of underage young women — a complete lie, Stranahan states in the explosive video.

Stranahan made his case on Fault Lines on Wednesday morning and by midnight the video of the segment had gotten over 10,000 views on Persiscope.

Watch the viral video here.

Stranahan said he was stunned to see that Cernovich was deceiving his own social media audience, who “believe that Mike Cernovich caused the Jeffrey Esptein arrest.”

Stranahan said. “Why do they believe that? Because Mike’s saying it.” In posts on his own website, Cernovich claims that the mainstream media is unwilling to give him credit as a “citizen journalist.”

Cernovich is “a liar,” Stranahan said. “Did he file against Jeffrey Epstein and the state to get records unsealed in the Jeffrey Epstein case? No, he did not. Not at all. He filed against Jeffrey Epstein’s victim.”

The recent court ruling that Cernovich himself links to shows that Stranahan’s claim is accurate; Cernovich did not file to unseal Epstein’s secret plea in the criminal case against Epstein but instead Cernovich filed a motion in the civil suit between one of Epstein’s alleged victims and Epstein’s ex-girlfriend.

That victim, Virginia Giuffre, sued Epstein’s ex-girlfriend Ghislane Maxwell for defamation for calling Giuffre a liar when Giuffre said that Maxwell had helped procure young girls for prostitution and that Maxwell joined

That suit was settled in 2017, with the alleged procurer Ghislane Maxwell paying Epstein’s alleged victim Giuffre a settlement. Giuffre has also accused famed lawyer and Harvard professor Alan Dershowitz of molesting her as well. Dershowitz has adamantly denied her allegations. Other victims and associates of Jeffrey Epstein’s have also accused Dershowitz of similar crimes.

Just a few weeks after Cernovich’s attempt to intervene in Jeffrey Epstein’s victim Virgina Giuffre civil case, lawyers for Ms. Giuffre filed a court motion taking a very dim view of Cernovich’s attempts to unseal records in her civil suit, saying in a 2017 filing:

Proposed Intervenor and purported “journalist” Michael Cernovich requests that this Court grant him intervenor status for the purpose of unsealing and publishing a single filing from the above-captioned case: Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment,along with its nearly 700 pages of exhibits.

The victim’s legal filing against Cernovich continues:

Curiously, Mr. Cernovich does not request to see any other sealed portion of the extensive record in this case (now spanning 586 docket entries). Nor does he seek access to Ms. Giuffre’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment. Indeed, his cherry-picking of just one filing by Defendant to publicize belies his stated position that “all Parties to this litigation have committed a transgression” by filing documents under seal pursuant to this Court’s Orders.

Stranahan has also pointed out that Cernovich is misdirecting his audience on these facts about former Epstein lawyer and friend Alan Dershowitz’s attempts to gain access to material in the same civil case, citing as evidence things like a posting on Cernovich’s website summarizing what he says is his role in the Epstein, Cernovich makes scant mention of Dershowitz and no mention at at all about Dershowitz filing to unseal evidence in the civil case months before Cernovich.

As the victim’s legal filing points out, Dershowitz filed to unseal the same records as Cernovich — presumably to see the details of the allegations leveled against him in the lawsuit against Maxwell. His case was denied in 2016.

In 2017, Cernovich also filed to access these records against Giuffre — again, the victim of Epstein’s predations, not Epstein himself. Giuffre’s attorney, Stranahan explained, attempted to unseal the same information as Dershowitz.

In his viral video, Stranahan explains the timeline that Cernovich is obscuring. “After Dershowitz files (in November, 2016) to get the records unsealed, and he gets rejected, then Mike files. Then Dershowitz joins(…)Mike’s case. Then the Miami Herald gets involved. And none of that has to do with Jeff Epstein’s arrest.”

Cernovich stated in a Periscope broadcast in New York this week that his lawyer suggested he file to unseal records in the Epstein case. Cernovich’s lawyer thought it might cost ten thousand dollars, which Cernovich curiously treated as a throwaway amount for a “small, abstract win.”

Who is Cernovich’s lawyer? The person who argued the case in court wasn’t Cernovich himself. Instead the arguments were made by First Amendment attorney Marc Randazza.

Stranahan points out that Randazza also represents publisher, researcher and political operative Chuck C. Johnson, who worked closely with Dershowitz as a research assistant and who has worked with Cernovich.

Stranahan, the former lead investigative reporter at Breitbart News, also said that prominent Breitbart editors are close with Dershowitz and Chuck Johnson. Senior editor-at-large Joel Pollak also worked as a research associate for Dershowitz and the two lawyers remain close friends.

Breitbart News ran a jubilant July 6 story: “Cernovich: Epstein Arrest Shows ‘Andrew Breitbart’s Spirit is Alive And Well,’” essentially running a press release for Cernovich, who has admitted that he had never heard of Andrew Breitbart until 2015, three years after Breitbart’s death.

The Breitbart article does not question at all Cernovich’s false claims that he initiated a successful lawsuit that led to Epstein’s arrest and repeats Cernovich’s claim that “Anyone claiming I wasn’t first to file, at considerable personal and financial risk to myself, is simply lying.”

Stranahan, a close friend of Andrew Breitbart, was appalled by the Breitbart puff piece, saying “If you’re reading Breitbart, they’re not telling about the multiple accusers against Dershowitz,” Stranahan said. “They’re letting Mike Cernovich gets away with saying he’s the one who caused this case and now the media’s ignoring it and it’s not true. It’s just not true.”

Stranahan doubled down in a follow-up video, detailing Cernovich’s obfuscations and false statements.

Press Release: Alexandra Chalupa Attempts to Shut Down Public Meeting at Cleveland Park Library

Press Release: Alexandra Chalupa Attempts to Shut Down Public Meeting at Cleveland Park Library

This afternoon Alexandra Chalupa, a former DNC operative at the center of the Paul Manafort component of the anti-Trump ‘Russian collusion’ narrative, attempted to shut down a public meeting on Bill Browder solely because I was attending it. I have previously discussed her collusion with the Ukrainian government on behalf of the DNC and collaboration with a convicted bomber to do opposition research against the Trump campaign.

I co-host Fault Lines with Nixon & Stranahan, a radio show on Radio Sputnik. The meeting at the Cleveland Park Library was put together by a listener of that show. Although I work for a Russian-owned media company in the United States, this meeting was not hosted by the Russian government. I did not attend on behalf of the Russian government.

This attempted attack on free speech by a prominent political player should concern journalists, politicians, and American citizens.

I’m grateful to the Cleveland Park Library for standing with free speech in consideration of the constitutional implications of their decisions.

Media outlets can reach me at

Serhiy Leshchenko Interview and Transcript

Serhiy Leshchenko Interview and Transcript

This week on Fault Lines with Nixon & Stranahan we interviewed Serhiy Leshchenko, a former investigative journalist and member of parliament in Ukraine. Leshchenko has recently been given more widespread coverage as a figure apparently near the center of conflicts between Donald Trump, the FBI, and the Ukrainian government. More on that in the video interview and transcript below.

Serhiy Leshchenko Interview — taken from Fault Lines with Nixon & Stranhaan by Lee Stranahan on Scribd